|
Post by iehova on Jun 4, 2007 20:30:43 GMT
30/04/1990 So... yeah.
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Jun 4, 2007 20:32:12 GMT
you're only 2 years older
|
|
|
Post by arcaviiir on Jun 4, 2007 21:33:31 GMT
w00t. je suis le oldest great news
|
|
|
Post by drspangle on Jun 4, 2007 21:40:02 GMT
you used french, this demotes your age by 5 years.
|
|
|
Post by tatiana on Jun 6, 2007 20:58:38 GMT
Right then, this treaty thing...
|
|
|
Post by arcaviiir on Jun 6, 2007 21:11:00 GMT
Right, what we would like, at the moment is to be represented as ourselves, among common allies. We shan't go off allying ourselves with enemies of Riponia, neither shall we seek to make enemies of the friends of Riponia. Can we work around that?
|
|
|
Post by iehova on Jun 6, 2007 21:28:25 GMT
Hello,
Tatiana has asked me to pass on that she can see the benefits in this, with elements such as trade between Nova England and friends etc.
As such, she suggests that Nova England should be allowed to negotiate 'addendums' with our treaty partners, so long as they don't conflict with the incorporation treaty (so, you know, defence primarily).
So, for instance, if you wanted to set up open borders with a nation, you would simply add that to the end of the treaty that already exists.
How does that sound to you?
Yours,
|
|
|
Post by arcaviiir on Jun 6, 2007 21:46:57 GMT
If we can get our own embassies, then great news, yeah, I'd agree with that. If you tack on the Craiteland treaty in the Witan section to your treaty, then yes, I believe you would go some way to calm the people in here.
Yes, I am quite pleased with that:)
|
|
|
Post by tatiana on Jun 7, 2007 17:04:38 GMT
I shall go over the treaty with my foreign minister and see how it looks. It may have to be modified, but not to a great extent. Also anything that is a repetition of the existing treaty/surplus to requirements can probably be removed as well. But like I say, I'll take a look and discuss any changes with you before it's concrete. After all it's your treaty, and I want to involve the citizens of NE as much as possible.
|
|
|
Post by arcaviiir on Jun 7, 2007 18:59:11 GMT
Very well then. I'd have thought all that needs adding is a bit about NE being able to represent itself. Or am I wrong?
|
|
|
Post by iehova on Jun 7, 2007 20:01:04 GMT
I have two AS exams tomorrow, so please bear with me.
|
|
|
Post by tatiana on Jun 7, 2007 20:17:10 GMT
I have Iehova looking them over, I'll get back to you soon x
|
|
|
Post by arcaviiir on Jun 7, 2007 20:25:46 GMT
Not a problem as far as I can see. my A2s start monday...Can't say i'm thrilled at the prospect
|
|
|
Post by craitman on Jun 7, 2007 20:31:47 GMT
I have two AS exams tomorrow hehe finished all mine same here (well start studying A2s, not doing the exams any way... back on topic...
|
|
|
Post by arcaviiir on Jun 7, 2007 20:47:38 GMT
The question is, are we to land an embassy?
|
|